Reforming the Dewan Negara: Its Evolution and Options for Reform


  • Ren Ming Fong



Reform, Dewan Negara, Constitutional Law, Parliamentary Democracy, Upper Houses


Despite its prominent position as the upper House of the Malaysian Parliament, the inherent structural and operational weaknesses of the Dewan Negara culminates in a chamber that fails to inspire public attention and confidence. This is a significant contrast with the attention that the lower House, the Dewan Rakyat usually draws and is a departure from the original vision that it should be an influential forum of debate and discussion. Nonetheless, the general apathy with which the public may perceive the chamber should not distract from the benefits that serious reform of the chamber may provide. As attention paid to parliamentary reform in Malaysia increasingly focuses overwhelmingly on the Dewan Rakyat, it is equally important that the Dewan Negara be considered as an integral element to any parliamentary reform efforts. In dealing with this issue, this paper explores the historical evolution of the Dewan Negara and the current issues it faces. It then performs a comparative study of the Australian and Canadian Senates to glean usable lessons, culminating in a discussion of possible reform options for the Dewan Negara.


Download data is not yet available.


‘Ali Rustam: Chinese didn’t appreciate me’ Astro Awani (6 May 2013) <> accessed 14 June 2020.

‘Mohd Ali Rustam barred from DP race, KJ given warning’ The Edge Markets (17 March 2009) <> accessed 14 June 2020.

Commission of Enquiry, North Borneo and Sarawak, Report of the Commission of Enquiry: North Borneo and Sarawak 1962 (Colonial Office, 1962).

Committees and Private Legislation Directorate, Senate of Canada, The Canadian Senate in Focus 1867-2001 <> accessed 20 December 2019.

Committees Directorate, Senate of Canada, Fundamentals of Senate Committees <> accessed 20 December 2019.

Constitution (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1984.

Constitution (Amendment) Act 1964.

Constitution (Amendment) Act 1978.

Constitution (Amendment) Act 2001.

Constitution Act (Canada) 1867.

Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Daud M.,‘Revolutionising the Senate in Malaysia: Lessons from Australia and Canada’ (2020) 3 MLJ xxxvii.

Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

Grenier É., ‘Why the Senate is unpredictable – and its independents not so independent’ CBC News (19 June 2017) <> accessed 20 December 2019.

Harding A., ‘The Dewan Negara and Constitutional Reform: Upper Houses in Comparative Perspective’ (2021) 1 Journal of the Malaysian Parliament 55.

Intergovernmental Committee on the proposed Federation of Malaysia, Report of the Inter-Governmental Committee 1963 2 International Legal Materials 423.

Mokhtar K.A., ‘Confusion, Coercion and Compromise in Malaysian Federalism’ in Harding A.J. and Chin J. (eds), 50 years of Malaysia: Federalism Revisited (Marshall Cavendish, 2016).

Muhriz T.Z.A., A New Dawn for the Dewan Negara? A Study of Malaysia’s Second Chamber and Some Proposals (Kuala Lumpur, IDEAS Malaysia, 2012) <> accessed 20 December 2019.

Parliament of Australia, Senate Brief No. 4: Senate Committees <> accessed 20 December 2019.

Parliament of Malaysia, ‘Takwim Dewan Negara’ <> accessed 3 April 2022.

Parliament of Malaysia, ‘Takwim Dewan Rakyat’ <> accessed 3 April 2022.

Recall of MPs Act (United Kingdom) 2015.

Reid Commission, Report of the Federation of Malaya Constitutional Commission 1957 (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1957).

Standing Orders of the Dewan Negara.